HIGH7.5
Уязвимость функции BN_mod_sqrt() библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.5
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCVSS 2.0ВЫСОКАЯ 7.8
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:CСсылки
ALT-PU-2023-6358-1Обновление пакета openssl1.1 в ветке p9_mipsel
Серьёзность:
Закрытые проблемы (26)
MEDIUM5.9
Уязвимость процедур возведения в квадрат MIPS32 и MIPS64 библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию
CVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 5.9
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NCVSS 2.0СРЕДНЯЯ 5.4
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:NСсылки
HIGH8.1
Уязвимость реализации сценария c_rehash библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю выполнять произвольные команды
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 8.1
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS 2.0ВЫСОКАЯ 7.6
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:CСсылки
CRITICAL9.8
Уязвимость функции модульного возведения в степень Монтгомери с постоянным временем библиотек OpenSSL и BoringSSL, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольный код
CVSS 3.xКРИТИЧЕСКАЯ 9.8
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCVSS 2.0КРИТИЧЕСКАЯ 10.0
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:CСсылки
LOW3.7
Уязвимость режима AES OCB библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию
CVSS 3.xНИЗКАЯ 3.7
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NCVSS 2.0НИЗКАЯ 2.6
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:NСсылки
HIGH7.4
Уязвимость функции GENERAL_NAME_cmp библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.4
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:HCVSS 2.0ВЫСОКАЯ 7.1
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:CСсылки
MEDIUM6.3
Уязвимость функции BIO_new_NDEF() библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
CVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 6.3
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:LCVSS 2.0СРЕДНЯЯ 6.5
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:PСсылки
HIGH7.5
Уязвимость криптографической библиотеки OpenSSL, связанная с ошибками процедуры подтверждения подлинности сертификата, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.5
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCVSS 2.0ВЫСОКАЯ 7.8
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:CСсылки
MEDIUM5.9
Уязвимость алгоритмов шифрования PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP и RSASVE криптографической библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю реализовать атаку Блейхенбахера (Bleichenbacher)
CVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 5.9
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NCVSS 2.0СРЕДНЯЯ 5.4
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:NСсылки
HIGH7.5
Уязвимость функции PEM_read_bio_ex() криптографической библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.5
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCVSS 2.0ВЫСОКАЯ 7.8
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:CСсылки
MEDIUM5.3
Уязвимость криптографической библиотеки OpenSSL, связанная с ошибками процедуры подтверждения подлинности сертификата, позволяющая нарушителю обойти проверку политик для сертификата
CVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 5.3
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:NCVSS 2.0СРЕДНЯЯ 5.0
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:NСсылки
HIGH7.5
Уязвимость библиотеки OpenSSL, связанная с неконтролируемым расходом ресурсов, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.5
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HCVSS 2.0ВЫСОКАЯ 7.8
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:CСсылки
MEDIUM5.3
Уязвимость функции X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить атаку типа «человек посередине»
CVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 5.3
CVSS:3.x/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:NCVSS 2.0СРЕДНЯЯ 5.0
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:NMEDIUM5.9
There is a carry propagation bug in the MIPS32 and MIPS64 squaring procedure. Many EC algorithms are affected, including some of the TLS 1.3 default curves. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because the pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely and include reusing private keys. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1m and 3.0.1 on the 15th of December 2021. For the 1.0.2 release it is addressed in git commit 6fc1aaaf3 that is available to premium support customers only. It will be made available in 1.0.2zc when it is released. The issue only affects OpenSSL on MIPS platforms. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.1 (Affected 3.0.0). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1m (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1l). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zc-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zb).
CVSS 2.0СРЕДНЯЯ 4.3
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:NCVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 5.9
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NСсылки
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3bf7b73ea7123045b8f972badc67ed6878e6c37f
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=6fc1aaaf303185aa5e483e06bdfae16daa9193a7
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e9e726506cd2a3fd9c0f12daf8cc1fe934c7dddb
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5103
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220128.txt
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-637483.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3bf7b73ea7123045b8f972badc67ed6878e6c37f
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=6fc1aaaf303185aa5e483e06bdfae16daa9193a7
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e9e726506cd2a3fd9c0f12daf8cc1fe934c7dddb
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5103
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220128.txt
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
HIGH7.5
The BN_mod_sqrt() function, which computes a modular square root, contains a bug that can cause it to loop forever for non-prime moduli. Internally this function is used when parsing certificates that contain elliptic curve public keys in compressed form or explicit elliptic curve parameters with a base point encoded in compressed form. It is possible to trigger the infinite loop by crafting a certificate that has invalid explicit curve parameters. Since certificate parsing happens prior to verification of the certificate signature, any process that parses an externally supplied certificate may thus be subject to a denial of service attack. The infinite loop can also be reached when parsing crafted private keys as they can contain explicit elliptic curve parameters. Thus vulnerable situations include: - TLS clients consuming server certificates - TLS servers consuming client certificates - Hosting providers taking certificates or private keys from customers - Certificate authorities parsing certification requests from subscribers - Anything else which parses ASN.1 elliptic curve parameters Also any other applications that use the BN_mod_sqrt() where the attacker can control the parameter values are vulnerable to this DoS issue. In the OpenSSL 1.0.2 version the public key is not parsed during initial parsing of the certificate which makes it slightly harder to trigger the infinite loop. However any operation which requires the public key from the certificate will trigger the infinite loop. In particular the attacker can use a self-signed certificate to trigger the loop during verification of the certificate signature. This issue affects OpenSSL versions 1.0.2, 1.1.1 and 3.0. It was addressed in the releases of 1.1.1n and 3.0.2 on the 15th March 2022. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.2 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1n (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1m). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zd (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zc).
CVSS 2.0СРЕДНЯЯ 5.0
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:PCVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.5
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HСсылки
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167344/OpenSSL-1.0.2-1.1.1-3.0-BN_mod_sqrt-Infinite-Loop.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-712929.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3118eb64934499d93db3230748a452351d1d9a65
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=380085481c64de749a6dd25cdf0bcf4360b30f83
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=a466912611aa6cbdf550cd10601390e587451246
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00023.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00024.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/323SNN6ZX7PRJJWP2BUAFLPUAE42XWLZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GDB3GQVJPXJE7X5C5JN6JAA4XUDWD6E6/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W6K3PR542DXWLEFFMFIDMME4CWMHJRMG/
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0002
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220321-0002/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220429-0005/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213255
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213256
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213257
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5103
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220315.txt
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-06
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-07
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-08
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-09
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167344/OpenSSL-1.0.2-1.1.1-3.0-BN_mod_sqrt-Infinite-Loop.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-712929.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=3118eb64934499d93db3230748a452351d1d9a65
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=380085481c64de749a6dd25cdf0bcf4360b30f83
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=a466912611aa6cbdf550cd10601390e587451246
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00023.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/03/msg00024.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/323SNN6ZX7PRJJWP2BUAFLPUAE42XWLZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GDB3GQVJPXJE7X5C5JN6JAA4XUDWD6E6/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/W6K3PR542DXWLEFFMFIDMME4CWMHJRMG/
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0002
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220321-0002/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220429-0005/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213255
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213256
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT213257
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5103
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220315.txt
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-06
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-07
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-08
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-09
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-019200.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-028723.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-108696.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-712929.html
HIGH7.3
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd).
CVSS 2.0КРИТИЧЕСКАЯ 10.0
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:CCVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.3
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HСсылки
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e5fd1728ef4c7a5bf7c7a7163ca60370460a6e23
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00019.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VX4KWHPMKYJL6ZLW4M5IU7E5UV5ZWJQU/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZNU5M7BXMML26G3GPYKFGQYPQDRSNKDD/
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0011
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220729-0004/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5139
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=1ad73b4d27bd8c1b369a3cd453681d3a4f1bb9b2
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=548d3f280a6e737673f5b61fce24bb100108dfeb
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=e5fd1728ef4c7a5bf7c7a7163ca60370460a6e23
- https://gitlab.com/fraf0/cve-2022-1292-re_score-analysis
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/05/msg00019.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VX4KWHPMKYJL6ZLW4M5IU7E5UV5ZWJQU/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZNU5M7BXMML26G3GPYKFGQYPQDRSNKDD/
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0011
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220729-0004/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5139
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
HIGH7.3
In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze).
CVSS 2.0КРИТИЧЕСКАЯ 10.0
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:CCVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.3
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HСсылки
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2c9c35870601b4a44d86ddbf512b38df38285cfa
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7a9c027159fe9e1bbc2cd38a8a2914bff0d5abd9
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=9639817dac8bbbaa64d09efad7464ccc405527c7
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6WZZBKUHQFGSKGNXXKICSRPL7AMVW5M5/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220707-0008/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5169
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220621.txt
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Nov/0
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2c9c35870601b4a44d86ddbf512b38df38285cfa
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=7a9c027159fe9e1bbc2cd38a8a2914bff0d5abd9
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=9639817dac8bbbaa64d09efad7464ccc405527c7
- https://gitlab.com/fraf0/cve-2022-1292-re_score-analysis
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6WZZBKUHQFGSKGNXXKICSRPL7AMVW5M5/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220707-0008/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5169
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220621.txt
MEDIUM5.3
AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of "in place" encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p).
CVSS 2.0СРЕДНЯЯ 5.0
CVSS:2.0/AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:NCVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 5.3
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NСсылки
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=919925673d6c9cfed3c1085497f5dfbbed5fc431
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=a98f339ddd7e8f487d6e0088d4a9a42324885a93
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/02/msg00019.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R6CK57NBQFTPUMXAPJURCGXUYT76NQAK/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V6567JERRHHJW2GNGJGKDRNHR7SNPZK7/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220715-0011/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230420-0008/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5343
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220705.txt
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-332410.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=919925673d6c9cfed3c1085497f5dfbbed5fc431
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=a98f339ddd7e8f487d6e0088d4a9a42324885a93
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/02/msg00019.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R6CK57NBQFTPUMXAPJURCGXUYT76NQAK/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V6567JERRHHJW2GNGJGKDRNHR7SNPZK7/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VCMNWKERPBKOEBNL7CLTTX3ZZCZLH7XA/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220715-0011/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230420-0008/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5343
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220705.txt
MEDIUM5.9
A timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption implementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a network in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful decryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number of trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA padding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS connection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted pre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine connection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial messages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a sufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the pre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to decrypt the application data sent over that connection.
CVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 5.9
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:NHIGH7.5
The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue.
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.5
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HСсылки
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=63bcf189be73a9cc1264059bed6f57974be74a83
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=bbcf509bd046b34cca19c766bbddc31683d0858b
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=63bcf189be73a9cc1264059bed6f57974be74a83
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=bbcf509bd046b34cca19c766bbddc31683d0858b
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2023-0003
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt
HIGH7.5
The public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for streaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL to support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also be called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO from the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter BIO onto the front of it to form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the caller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS recipient public key is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function returns a NULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is not properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains internal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then goes on to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur. This will most likely result in a crash. This scenario occurs directly in the internal function B64_write_ASN1() which may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to be called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on the BIO. This internal function is in turn called by the public API functions PEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream, PEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream, SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and SMIME_write_PKCS7. Other public API functions that may be impacted by this include i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7, i2d_CMS_bio_stream and i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream. The OpenSSL cms and smime command line applications are similarly affected.
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.5
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HСсылки
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8818064ce3c3c0f1b740a5aaba2a987e75bfbafd
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9816136fe31d92ace4037d5da5257f763aeeb4eb
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c3829dd8825c654652201e16f8a0a0c46ee3f344
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230427-0007/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230427-0009/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=8818064ce3c3c0f1b740a5aaba2a987e75bfbafd
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9816136fe31d92ace4037d5da5257f763aeeb4eb
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c3829dd8825c654652201e16f8a0a0c46ee3f344
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2023-0003
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230427-0007/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230427-0009/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt
HIGH7.4
There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network.
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.4
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:HСсылки
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.2-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/018_x509.patch.sig
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2c6c9d439b484e1ba9830d8454a34fa4f80fdfe9
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2f7530077e0ef79d98718138716bc51ca0cad658
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd2af07dc083a350c959147097003a14a5e8ac4d
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.2-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/018_x509.patch.sig
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2c6c9d439b484e1ba9830d8454a34fa4f80fdfe9
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2f7530077e0ef79d98718138716bc51ca0cad658
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fd2af07dc083a350c959147097003a14a5e8ac4d
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2023-0003
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt
HIGH7.5
A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.
CVSS 3.xВЫСОКАЯ 7.5
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HСсылки
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2017771e2db3e2b96f89bbe8766c3209f6a99545
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2dcd4f1e3115f38cefa43e3efbe9b801c27e642e
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=879f7080d7e141f415c79eaa3a8ac4a3dad0348b
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://www.couchbase.com/alerts/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230322.txt
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2017771e2db3e2b96f89bbe8766c3209f6a99545
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2dcd4f1e3115f38cefa43e3efbe9b801c27e642e
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=879f7080d7e141f415c79eaa3a8ac4a3dad0348b
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=959c59c7a0164117e7f8366466a32bb1f8d77ff1
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230406-0006/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://www.couchbase.com/alerts/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230322.txt
MEDIUM5.3
Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.
CVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 5.3
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:NСсылки
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=10325176f3d3e98c6e2b3bf5ab1e3b334de6947a
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=10325176f3d3e98c6e2b3bf5ab1e3b334de6947a
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt
MEDIUM5.3
The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to implicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate verification. However the implementation of the function does not enable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to pass the certificate verification. As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was decided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function. Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate policy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly enable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument. Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not commonly used by applications.
CVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 5.3
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:NСсылки
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/4
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/4
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0d16b7e99aafc0b4a6d729eec65a411a7e025f0a
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=51e8a84ce742db0f6c70510d0159dad8f7825908
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=73398dea26de9899fb4baa94098ad0a61f435c72
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt
MEDIUM6.5
Issue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or data containing them may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of the OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message size limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those messages, which may lead to a Denial of Service. An OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers - most of which have no size limit. OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate an ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL type ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the sub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by periods. When one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large (these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds of KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long time. The time complexity is O(n^2) with 'n' being the size of the sub-identifiers in bytes (*). With OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names / identifiers in string form was introduced. This includes using OBJECT IDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching algorithms. Such OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure AlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify what cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or decrypt, or digest passed data. Applications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are affected, with any version of OpenSSL. If the use is for the mere purpose of display, the severity is considered low. In OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS. It also impacts anything that processes X.509 certificates, including simple things like verifying its signature. The impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a 100KiB limit on the peer's certificate chain. Additionally, this only impacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client authentication. In OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects, such as X.509 certificates. This is assumed to not happen in such a way that it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered not affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern, and the severity is therefore considered low.
CVSS 3.xСРЕДНЯЯ 6.5
CVSS:3.x/CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HСсылки
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/30/1
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=423a2bc737a908ad0c77bda470b2b59dc879936b
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=853c5e56ee0b8650c73140816bb8b91d6163422c
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9e209944b35cf82368071f160a744b6178f9b098
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=db779b0e10b047f2585615e0b8f2acdf21f8544a
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2023-0009
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230703-0001/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0009/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230530.txt
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/05/30/1
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=423a2bc737a908ad0c77bda470b2b59dc879936b
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=853c5e56ee0b8650c73140816bb8b91d6163422c
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=9e209944b35cf82368071f160a744b6178f9b098
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=db779b0e10b047f2585615e0b8f2acdf21f8544a
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2023-0009
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230703-0001/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0009/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230530.txt