Уязвимость программного обеспечения для реализации VNC TigerVNC, связанная с ошибками процедуры подтверждения подлинности сертификата, позволяющая нарушителю получить доступ к конфиденциальным данным и нарушить их целостность

Уязвимость компонента GLX PBuffer Handler реализации сервера X Window System X.Org Server, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Уязвимость компонента Privates Handler реализации сервера X Window System X.Org Server, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить произвольный код

In rfb/CSecurityTLS.cxx and rfb/CSecurityTLS.java in TigerVNC before 1.11.0, viewers mishandle TLS certificate exceptions. They store the certificates as authorities, meaning that the owner of a certificate could impersonate any server after a client had added an exception.

A flaw was found in the X.Org server. The GLX PBuffer code does not call the XACE hook when creating the buffer, leaving it unlabeled. When the client issues another request to access that resource (as with a GetGeometry) or when it creates another resource that needs to access that buffer, such as a GC, the XSELINUX code will try to use an object that was never labeled and crash because the SID is NULL.

A flaw was found in the X.Org server. The cursor code in both Xephyr and Xwayland uses the wrong type of private at creation. It uses the cursor bits type with the cursor as private, and when initiating the cursor, that overwrites the XSELINUX context.

Уязвимость компилятора инструмента для html-шаблонизации jinja, позволяющая нарушителю обойти защитный механизм песочницы, выполнить произвольный код или вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Уязвимость метода str.format() инструмента для html-шаблонизации jinja, позволяющая нарушителю обойти защитный механизм песочницы, выполнить произвольный код или вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Уязвимость компилятора инструмента для html-шаблонизации jinja, связанная с непринятием мер по нейтрализации специальных элементов в механизме создания шаблонов, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Jinja is an extensible templating engine. In versions on the 3.x branch prior to 3.1.5, a bug in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker that controls both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, regardless of if Jinja's sandbox is used. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control both the filename and the contents of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates where the template author can also choose the template filename. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.5.

Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.5, An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.5.

Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6.

Отсутствует проверка вводимых данных в полях "Что будем сжимать?" и "Куда будем сохранять?".

A weakness has been identified in LibTIFF 4.7.0. This affects the function main of the file tiffcrop.c of the component tiffcrop. Executing manipulation can lead to memory corruption. The attack can only be executed locally. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Обновление пакета remmina до 1.4.36

Уязвимость программного пакета X.Org Server, вызванная ошибками при обработке и проверке параметров командной строки, позволяющая нарушителю получить привилегии root и перезаписать произвольный файл в операционной системе

Уязвимость функции RRChangeProviderProperty() сервера X Window System Xorg-server, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Уязвимость расширения X Rendering реализации сервера X Window System X.Org Server и реализации протокола Wayland для X.Org XWayland, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Уязвимость расширения Big Requests реализации протокола Wayland для X.Org XWayland и реализации сервера X Window System X.Org Server, позволяющая нарушителю получить доступ к конфиденциальным данным, нарушить их целостность, а также вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Уязвимость функции ReadRequestFromClient компонента os/io.c реализации протокола Wayland для X.Org XWayland и реализации сервера X Window System X.Org Server, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server before 1.20.3. An incorrect permission check for -modulepath and -logfile options when starting Xorg. X server allows unprivileged users with the ability to log in to the system via physical console to escalate their privileges and run arbitrary code under root privileges.

A flaw was found in the X Rendering extension's handling of animated cursors. If a client provides no cursors, the server assumes at least one is present, leading to an out-of-bounds read and potential crash.

A flaw was found in the Big Requests extension. The request length is multiplied by 4 before checking against the maximum allowed size, potentially causing an integer overflow and bypassing the size check.

A flaw was found in the X server's request handling. Non-zero 'bytes to ignore' in a client's request can cause the server to skip processing another client's request, potentially leading to a denial of service.

A flaw was found in the RandR extension, where the RRChangeProviderProperty function does not properly validate input. This issue leads to an integer overflow when computing the total size to allocate.