ALT-BU-2023-6873-1
Branch p10_e2k update bulletin.
Closed vulnerabilities
BDU:2021-04571
Уязвимость функции X509_aux_print() библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию или вызвать отказ в обслуживании
BDU:2023-00665
Уязвимость функции GENERAL_NAME_cmp библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2021-3712
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y).
- [oss-security] 20210825 OpenSSL SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow (CVE-2021-3711), Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings (CVE-2021-3712)
- [oss-security] 20210825 OpenSSL SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow (CVE-2021-3711), Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings (CVE-2021-3712)
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-244969.pdf
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-244969.pdf
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=94d23fcff9b2a7a8368dfe52214d5c2569882c11
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=94d23fcff9b2a7a8368dfe52214d5c2569882c11
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=ccb0a11145ee72b042d10593a64eaf9e8a55ec12
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=ccb0a11145ee72b042d10593a64eaf9e8a55ec12
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366
- [tomcat-dev] 20210825 OpenSSL security announcement - do we need a Tomcat Native release?
- [tomcat-dev] 20210825 OpenSSL security announcement - do we need a Tomcat Native release?
- [tomcat-dev] 20210826 Re: OpenSSL security announcement - do we need a Tomcat Native release?
- [tomcat-dev] 20210826 Re: OpenSSL security announcement - do we need a Tomcat Native release?
- [debian-lts-announce] 20210926 [SECURITY] [DLA 2766-1] openssl security update
- [debian-lts-announce] 20210926 [SECURITY] [DLA 2766-1] openssl security update
- [debian-lts-announce] 20210930 [SECURITY] [DLA 2774-1] openssl1.0 security update
- [debian-lts-announce] 20210930 [SECURITY] [DLA 2774-1] openssl1.0 security update
- GLSA-202209-02
- GLSA-202209-02
- GLSA-202210-02
- GLSA-202210-02
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210827-0010/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210827-0010/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- DSA-4963
- DSA-4963
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210824.txt
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210824.txt
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-16
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-16
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-02
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2022-02
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2021-41581
x509_constraints_parse_mailbox in lib/libcrypto/x509/x509_constraints.c in LibreSSL through 3.4.0 has a stack-based buffer over-read. When the input exceeds DOMAIN_PART_MAX_LEN, the buffer lacks '\0' termination.
Modified: 2025-02-07
CVE-2021-46880
x509/x509_verify.c in LibreSSL before 3.4.2, and OpenBSD before 7.0 errata 006, allows authentication bypass because an error for an unverified certificate chain is sometimes discarded.
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.4.2-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.4.2-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.0/common/006_x509.patch.sig
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.0/common/006_x509.patch.sig
- https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/3f851282810fa0ab4b90b3b1ecec2e8717ef16f8
- https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/3f851282810fa0ab4b90b3b1ecec2e8717ef16f8
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230517-0006/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230517-0006/
Modified: 2025-02-10
CVE-2022-48437
An issue was discovered in x509/x509_verify.c in LibreSSL before 3.6.1, and in OpenBSD before 7.2 errata 001. x509_verify_ctx_add_chain does not store errors that occur during leaf certificate verification, and therefore an incorrect error is returned. This behavior occurs when there is an installed verification callback that instructs the verifier to continue upon detecting an invalid certificate.
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.1-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.1-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/001_x509.patch.sig
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/001_x509.patch.sig
- https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/4f94258c65a918ee3d8670e93916d15bf879e6ec
- https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/4f94258c65a918ee3d8670e93916d15bf879e6ec
Modified: 2025-03-21
CVE-2023-0286
There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network.
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.2-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.2-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/018_x509.patch.sig
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/018_x509.patch.sig
- 1.1.1t git commit
- 1.1.1t git commit
- 3.0.8 git commit
- 3.0.8 git commit
- 1.0.2zg patch (premium)
- 1.0.2zg patch (premium)
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- OpenSSL Advisory
- OpenSSL Advisory
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2023-35784
A double free or use after free could occur after SSL_clear in OpenBSD 7.2 before errata 026 and 7.3 before errata 004, and in LibreSSL before 3.6.3 and 3.7.x before 3.7.3. NOTE: OpenSSL is not affected.
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.3-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.7.3-relnotes.txt
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/026_ssl.patch.sig
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.3/common/004_ssl.patch.sig
- https://github.com/libressl/openbsd/commit/e42d8f4b21a8a498e2eabbffe4c7b7d4ef7cec54
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.6.3-relnotes.txt
- https://github.com/libressl/openbsd/commit/e42d8f4b21a8a498e2eabbffe4c7b7d4ef7cec54
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.3/common/004_ssl.patch.sig
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/7.2/common/026_ssl.patch.sig
- https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/LibreSSL/libressl-3.7.3-relnotes.txt
No data currently available.
Closed bugs
Конфликт
Closed vulnerabilities
BDU:2022-04051
Уязвимость реализации сетевого протокола Gopher прокси-сервера Squid, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
BDU:2023-00066
Уязвимость кэширующего прокси-сервера Squid, связанная с неправильным контролем доступа, позволяющая нарушителю получить доступ к конфиденциальной информации
BDU:2023-01309
Уязвимость интерфейса Security Support Provider Interface (SSPI) и реализации сетевого протокола Server Message Block (SMB) прокси-сервера Squid, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию или вызвать отказ в обслуживании
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2021-46784
In Squid 3.x through 3.5.28, 4.x through 4.17, and 5.x before 5.6, due to improper buffer management, a Denial of Service can occur when processing long Gopher server responses.
- [oss-security] 20231013 Re: Squid Caching Proxy Security Audit: 55 Vulnerabilities, 35 0days.
- [oss-security] 20231013 Re: Squid Caching Proxy Security Audit: 55 Vulnerabilities, 35 0days.
- [oss-security] 20231013 Re: Squid Caching Proxy Security Audit: 55 Vulnerabilities, 35 0days.
- [oss-security] 20231013 Re: Squid Caching Proxy Security Audit: 55 Vulnerabilities, 35 0days.
- [oss-security] 20231021 Re: Squid Caching Proxy Security Audit: 55 Vulnerabilities, 35 0days.
- [oss-security] 20231021 Re: Squid Caching Proxy Security Audit: 55 Vulnerabilities, 35 0days.
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/changesets/SQUID-2021_7.patch
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/changesets/SQUID-2021_7.patch
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v5/changesets/SQUID-2021_7.patch
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v5/changesets/SQUID-2021_7.patch
- https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/commit/5e2ea2b13bd98f53e29964ca26bb0d602a8a12b9
- https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/commit/5e2ea2b13bd98f53e29964ca26bb0d602a8a12b9
- https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/security/advisories/GHSA-f5cp-6rh3-284w
- https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/security/advisories/GHSA-f5cp-6rh3-284w
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221223-0007/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221223-0007/
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-46784
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-46784
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2022-41317
An issue was discovered in Squid 4.9 through 4.17 and 5.0.6 through 5.6. Due to inconsistent handling of internal URIs, there can be Exposure of Sensitive Information about clients using the proxy via an HTTPS request to an internal cache manager URL. This is fixed in 5.7.
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/changesets/SQUID-2022_1.patch
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/changesets/SQUID-2022_1.patch
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v5/changesets/SQUID-2022_1.patch
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v5/changesets/SQUID-2022_1.patch
- https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/security/advisories/GHSA-rcg9-7fqm-83mq
- https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/security/advisories/GHSA-rcg9-7fqm-83mq
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/23/1
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/23/1
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2022-41318
A buffer over-read was discovered in libntlmauth in Squid 2.5 through 5.6. Due to incorrect integer-overflow protection, the SSPI and SMB authentication helpers are vulnerable to reading unintended memory locations. In some configurations, cleartext credentials from these locations are sent to a client. This is fixed in 5.7.
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/changesets/SQUID-2022_2.patch
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/changesets/SQUID-2022_2.patch
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v5/changesets/SQUID-2022_2.patch
- http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v5/changesets/SQUID-2022_2.patch
- https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/security/advisories/GHSA-394c-rr7q-6g78
- https://github.com/squid-cache/squid/security/advisories/GHSA-394c-rr7q-6g78
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/23/2
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/09/23/2
Closed bugs
Невозможно получить доступ к cache manager из под squidclient
Package openssl1.1 updated to version 1.1.1w-alt0.p10.1 for branch p10_e2k.
Closed vulnerabilities
BDU:2023-04957
Уязвимость функций DH_check(), DH_check_ex() или EVP_PKEY_param_check() библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
BDU:2023-04960
Уязвимость функций DH_check(), DH_check_ex(), EVP_PKEY_param_check() библиотеки OpenSSL, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
BDU:2023-05872
Уязвимость криптографической библиотеки OpenSSL, связанная с неправильной проверкой ввода, позволяющая нарушителю выполнить атаку типа «отказ в обслуживании»
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2023-3446
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those checks confirms that the modulus ('p' parameter) is not too large. Trying to use a very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which is over 10,000 bits in length. However the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters that have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value even if it has already been found to be too large. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the '-check' option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/4
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/19/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/16/1
- 3.0.10 git commit
- 3.0.10 git commit
- 1.1.1v git commit
- 1.1.1v git commit
- 1.0.2zi patch (premium)
- 1.0.2zi patch (premium)
- 3.1.2 git commit
- 3.1.2 git commit
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230803-0011/
- OpenSSL Advisory
- OpenSSL Advisory
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2023-3817
Issue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow. Impact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex() or EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long delays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained from an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service. The function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. After fixing CVE-2023-3446 it was discovered that a large q parameter value can also trigger an overly long computation during some of these checks. A correct q value, if present, cannot be larger than the modulus p parameter, thus it is unnecessary to perform these checks if q is larger than p. An application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained from an untrusted source could be vulnerable to a Denial of Service attack. The function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions. An application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected. The other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and EVP_PKEY_param_check(). Also vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications when using the "-check" option. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/43
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/31/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/11
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/22/9
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/11/06/2
- 3.1.2 git commit
- 3.1.2 git commit
- 1.0.2zi patch (premium)
- 1.0.2zi patch (premium)
- 3.0.10 git commit
- 3.0.10 git commit
- 1.1.1v git commit
- 1.1.1v git commit
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/08/msg00019.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230818-0014/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0008/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240621-0006/
- OpenSSL Advisory
- OpenSSL Advisory
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2023-4807
Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the Windows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. Impact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does not save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform when calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to the caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their previous content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application process. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so the attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider this a Low severity security issue. As a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at runtime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap: OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000 The FIPS provider is not affected by this issue.
Package gis-weather updated to version 0.8.4.17-alt1 for branch p10_e2k.
Closed bugs
gis-weather не работает. Необходимо обновление
Closed vulnerabilities
BDU:2023-06596
Уязвимость функции trunc_string() текстового редактора Vim, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2023-5344
Heap-based Buffer Overflow in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 9.0.1969.
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Dec/10
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Dec/10
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Dec/11
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Dec/11
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Dec/9
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Dec/9
- https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/3bd7fa12e146c6051490d048a4acbfba974eeb04
- https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/3bd7fa12e146c6051490d048a4acbfba974eeb04
- https://huntr.dev/bounties/530cb762-899e-48d7-b50e-dad09eb775bf
- https://huntr.dev/bounties/530cb762-899e-48d7-b50e-dad09eb775bf
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4W665GQBN6S6ZDMYWVF4X7KMFI7AQKJL/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4W665GQBN6S6ZDMYWVF4X7KMFI7AQKJL/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XPT7NMYJRLBPIALGSE24UWTY6F774GZW/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XPT7NMYJRLBPIALGSE24UWTY6F774GZW/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZOXBUJLJ5VSPN3YXWN7XZA4JDYKNE7GZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZOXBUJLJ5VSPN3YXWN7XZA4JDYKNE7GZ/
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214036
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214036
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214037
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214037
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214038
- https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214038
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2023-5441
NULL Pointer Dereference in GitHub repository vim/vim prior to 20d161ace307e28690229b68584f2d84556f8960.
- https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/20d161ace307e28690229b68584f2d84556f8960
- https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/20d161ace307e28690229b68584f2d84556f8960
- https://huntr.dev/bounties/b54cbdf5-3e85-458d-bb38-9ea2c0b669f2
- https://huntr.dev/bounties/b54cbdf5-3e85-458d-bb38-9ea2c0b669f2
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VDDWD25AZIHBAA44HQT75OWLQ5UMDKU3/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VDDWD25AZIHBAA44HQT75OWLQ5UMDKU3/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VGTVLUV7UCXXCZAIQIUCLG6JXAVYT3HE/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VGTVLUV7UCXXCZAIQIUCLG6JXAVYT3HE/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XPT7NMYJRLBPIALGSE24UWTY6F774GZW/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XPT7NMYJRLBPIALGSE24UWTY6F774GZW/
Package apache2-mod_http2 updated to version 2.0.25-alt1 for branch p10_e2k.
Closed vulnerabilities
BDU:2023-07003
Уязвимость компонента обработчика HTTP2 веб-сервера Apache HTTP Server, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
Modified: 2024-11-21
CVE-2023-45802
When a HTTP/2 stream was reset (RST frame) by a client, there was a time window were the request's memory resources were not reclaimed immediately. Instead, de-allocation was deferred to connection close. A client could send new requests and resets, keeping the connection busy and open and causing the memory footprint to keep on growing. On connection close, all resources were reclaimed, but the process might run out of memory before that. This was found by the reporter during testing of CVE-2023-44487 (HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Exploit) with their own test client. During "normal" HTTP/2 use, the probability to hit this bug is very low. The kept memory would not become noticeable before the connection closes or times out. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.58, which fixes the issue.
- https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html
- https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/05/msg00013.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2MBEPPC36UBVOZZNAXFHKLFGSLCMN5LI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BFQD3KUEMFBHPAPBGLWQC34L4OWL5HAZ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WE2I52RHNNU42PX6NZ2RBUHSFFJ2LVZX/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0011/
Closed vulnerabilities
BDU:2023-07124
Уязвимость модуля mod_macro веб-сервера Apache HTTP Server, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании
Modified: 2025-02-13
CVE-2023-31122
Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in mod_macro of Apache HTTP Server.This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: through 2.4.57.
- https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html
- https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/05/msg00013.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/05/msg00013.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TI3V2YCEUM65QDYPGGNUZ7UONIM5OEXC/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TI3V2YCEUM65QDYPGGNUZ7UONIM5OEXC/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VZJTT5TEFNSBWVMKCLS6EZ7PI6EJYBCO/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VZJTT5TEFNSBWVMKCLS6EZ7PI6EJYBCO/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZFDNHDH4VLFGDPY6MEZV2RO5N5FLFONW/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZFDNHDH4VLFGDPY6MEZV2RO5N5FLFONW/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0011/
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0011/
Package papirus-icon-theme updated to version 20230901-alt2 for branch p10_e2k.
Closed bugs
icon-theme-Papirus-Education: missing icons for NetworkManager-applet-gtk
(alt-education-10.2-x86_64.iso) new user defaults for icon-theme-Papirus-Education breaks network applet