containerd is an open source container runtime. On installations using SELinux, such as EL8 (CentOS, RHEL), Fedora, or SUSE MicroOS, with containerd since v1.5.0-beta.0 as the backing container runtime interface (CRI), an unprivileged pod scheduled to the node may bind mount, via hostPath volume, any privileged, regular file on disk for complete read/write access (sans delete). Such is achieved by placing the in-container location of the hostPath volume mount at either `/etc/hosts`, `/etc/hostname`, or `/etc/resolv.conf`. These locations are being relabeled indiscriminately to match the container process-label which effectively elevates permissions for savvy containers that would not normally be able to access privileged host files. This issue has been resolved in version 1.5.9. Users are advised to upgrade as soon as possible.

Уязвимость компонента защищённого доступа Wi-Fi WPA Supplicant, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Уязвимость реализации SAE клиента защищённого доступа Wi-Fi WPA Supplicant, связанная с раскрытием информации через несоответствие, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию

Уязвимость реализации EAP-pwd клиента защищённого доступа Wi-Fi WPA Supplicant, связанная с раскрытием информации через несоответствие, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию

hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 allow an incorrect indication of disconnection in certain situations because source address validation is mishandled. This is a denial of service that should have been prevented by PMF (aka management frame protection). The attacker must send a crafted 802.11 frame from a location that is within the 802.11 communications range.

In wpa_supplicant and hostapd 2.9, forging attacks may occur because AlgorithmIdentifier parameters are mishandled in tls/pkcs1.c and tls/x509v3.c.

The implementations of SAE in hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 are vulnerable to side channel attacks as a result of cache access patterns. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-9494.

The implementations of EAP-pwd in hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 are vulnerable to side-channel attacks as a result of cache access patterns. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-9495.

Уязвимость компонента защищённого доступа Wi-Fi WPA Supplicant, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании

Уязвимость компонента p2p/p2p_pd.c клиента защищённого доступа Wi-Fi WPA Supplicant, позволяющая нарушителю вызвать отказ в обслуживании или выполнить произвольный код

Уязвимость реализации SAE клиента защищённого доступа Wi-Fi WPA Supplicant, связанная с раскрытием информации через несоответствие, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию

Уязвимость реализации EAP-pwd клиента защищённого доступа Wi-Fi WPA Supplicant, связанная с раскрытием информации через несоответствие, позволяющая нарушителю раскрыть защищаемую информацию

hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 allow an incorrect indication of disconnection in certain situations because source address validation is mishandled. This is a denial of service that should have been prevented by PMF (aka management frame protection). The attacker must send a crafted 802.11 frame from a location that is within the 802.11 communications range.

A vulnerability was discovered in how p2p/p2p_pd.c in wpa_supplicant before 2.10 processes P2P (Wi-Fi Direct) provision discovery requests. It could result in denial of service or other impact (potentially execution of arbitrary code), for an attacker within radio range.

In wpa_supplicant and hostapd 2.9, forging attacks may occur because AlgorithmIdentifier parameters are mishandled in tls/pkcs1.c and tls/x509v3.c.

The implementations of SAE in hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 are vulnerable to side channel attacks as a result of cache access patterns. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-9494.

The implementations of EAP-pwd in hostapd before 2.10 and wpa_supplicant before 2.10 are vulnerable to side-channel attacks as a result of cache access patterns. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2019-9495.